Player suspenion: tominator` / lump
Hello,
Unfortunately I've had to ban lump for being annoying and wasting admins' time. I was already considering banning him yesterday but as he showed no regret and instead of kept nagging about the issue and finally attacking my personally, I've decided to take action.
So to help you understand the ban and that we do this to keep ourselves mentally sane and ENSL games just, I will give you the background of all this:
If a player or even whole team cannot play because they warp, its too bad, take care of your connection problems or face the consequences. We cannot let people use connection problems (which can be faked easily) to gain reschedules or anything other benefit. If rule enforcements break your strat, its too bad. If we took "vital roles" into consideration when enforcing rules, people could easily avoid rule enforcements.
The length of his suspension will be decided later on but currently its indefinite. This is still up to admin discussion, and most likely he won't be able to play atleast one or more of the next cups we are planning to arrange.
If you feel some rule is stupid or otherwise unacceptable, use the feedback forum to request a rule change with reason. That is the correct way to address problems, not starting to debate in semi-finals about rules that everyone who participated in the league agreed to when they joined it.
Yours,
ENSL Staff
Unfortunately I've had to ban lump for being annoying and wasting admins' time. I was already considering banning him yesterday but as he showed no regret and instead of kept nagging about the issue and finally attacking my personally, I've decided to take action.
So to help you understand the ban and that we do this to keep ourselves mentally sane and ENSL games just, I will give you the background of all this:
- Yesterday Vital and Rawr were their playing Semi-Final
- Lump played with a warping fade one alien round
- Vital didn't want lump to warp fade again. Warping is not allowed by rules:
If player gets high ping or warps continiously, referee will request the player to leave. In case there is no referee, demos will be inspected after the game and a forfeit loss may be given.
That rule has been there since the beginning of the league, and modified by me some season ago as a part of bigger update, which was annoucned in the news.
- I decided to use admin's right to exception (1.3) and let lump play but not allow him fade or lerk.
- Then instead of accepting the decision, and the fact that when we have rules we actually follow them and its not a debate, rawr, especially lump started to:
- Whine about it for 20mins
- Played in the lucid alien round and complain when he had 50 res
=> He could have taken a task, in which he was unlikely to end up with 50 res
=> Rawr could have used other member or use a merc that the other team can accept.
- Today starting this whole debate again and finally attacked me personally on private when I warned that I'm not interested in this whine anymore
If a player or even whole team cannot play because they warp, its too bad, take care of your connection problems or face the consequences. We cannot let people use connection problems (which can be faked easily) to gain reschedules or anything other benefit. If rule enforcements break your strat, its too bad. If we took "vital roles" into consideration when enforcing rules, people could easily avoid rule enforcements.
The length of his suspension will be decided later on but currently its indefinite. This is still up to admin discussion, and most likely he won't be able to play atleast one or more of the next cups we are planning to arrange.
If you feel some rule is stupid or otherwise unacceptable, use the feedback forum to request a rule change with reason. That is the correct way to address problems, not starting to debate in semi-finals about rules that everyone who participated in the league agreed to when they joined it.
Yours,
ENSL Staff
Comments
Sharpi
IS
GREAT NEWS!!!
16 June 2008, 15:12
frost
I also saw some chat about forfeit, but they were told they could not. And they (rawr) looked like they didn't want to play lucid at all, essentially forfeiting that map anyway by they way they played, or didn't play as the case was.
From an outside perspective, this was handled badly by all parties. Not only lump and his team.
16 June 2008, 15:21
jiriki | old people
The merc was Macpersil, who in my opinion atleast is a lot better than lump (having played both for sprogga and flatline with great performance) so I don't blame vital for not accepting him either - mercs are not allowed by default.
16 June 2008, 15:29
frost
I don't mean to turn blame, hardly like that, I don't hold either team in higher regards. I was just watching the game, and it was more than a little irritating just watching an argument for 20+ minutes.
16 June 2008, 15:33
sublime
16 June 2008, 15:43
sublime
"Rawr themselves took a forfeit last week when vital was not showing up"
WHICH MEANS WE ARE IN THE FINAL
16 June 2008, 15:46
ZiGGY
16 June 2008, 15:47
jiriki | old people
16 June 2008, 15:52
sublime
We did not break the rules since during the original game we claimed the forfeit, therefore this subsequent game has no bearing my argument.
Also, where did lump break the rules? We played the lucid round and in your own words he did not lerk or fade. So where exactly is the rule breach?
16 June 2008, 15:55
jiriki | old people
Ziggy, yea sure, I'm sure you would love to admin a league where rules wouldn't be there to be followed. I can tell by experience what happens when you have clear rules and you don't follow them. Its so easy to whine when you are not on the receiving end of unfollowed rules.
16 June 2008, 15:55
jiriki | old people
16 June 2008, 15:57
dAn00b
Also from what I gather, we didn't get any chance whatsoever to play a replay where last week, when vital suddenly had 1 player less could just reschedule? If I remember correctly we asked BB to get a merc(any merc). We also didn't want to delay the date of the final, that's why we we're considering the default win, which we didn't because it would show no sportsmanship nor any respect to vital.
Sounds a bit fishy to me, maybe even favoritism of admins. Anyways congrats Vital
16 June 2008, 15:59
sublime
Also, we did not break the rules in the second game. Lump did not lerk or fade after the admin had told him not to, therefore he did not break the rules.
16 June 2008, 16:00
jiriki | old people
16 June 2008, 16:01
sublime
16 June 2008, 16:04
Jamesbond007
8DOM8
16 June 2008, 16:05
sublime
Jiriki I'm waiting; talk to me on steam friends if you want.
16 June 2008, 16:07
sublime
16 June 2008, 16:08
sublime
I find this wholly unacceptable; I am unable to ascertain where we broke the rules, we did not have our first team and we originally claimed a forfeit.
Yet we are being forced to forfeit ourselves for what appears to be no reason.
16 June 2008, 16:10
jiriki | old people
16 June 2008, 16:10
sublime
16 June 2008, 16:13
jiriki | old people
16 June 2008, 16:14
sublime
"If player gets high ping or warps continiously, referee will request the player to leave."
Lump agreed to leave, we agreed to take a merc. However vital found both of these choices to be disagreeable, therefore the outcome should be a full replay.
16 June 2008, 16:15
sublime
16 June 2008, 16:15
dAn00b
You forget to add, the team requested a replay, which was refused, and did get a merc, who was also refused.
I also saw some chat about forfeit, but they were told they could not. And they (rawr) looked like they didn't want to play lucid at all, essentially forfeiting that map anyway by they way they played, or didn't play as the case was.
I did say I'm not defending Tom since I don't know what happened. I just see favoritism by admins in what Frost said. In particular about the last 'rule', which probably isn't one.
9.4 Fair Play
We want to encourage fair play and good sportsmanship. There are some unwritten rules and no-one should try their luck exploiting things just because rules mention nothing specifically about such.
Even if mp was 'too high skilled' as a merc, I don't see TTS complaining about NS-F getting a merc. (I haven't seen TTS complain ever btw :p)
I just wanted to point this out. For the rest I can't nor won't say that Vital didn't deserve to win.
16 June 2008, 16:18
sublime
Macpersil is nowhere near above our level - berglund, ziggy, lump and I have all played in the first division.
So vital would not accept our correct application of the rule, rather they forced us to use a player which could not use all the permutations of the game.
This is clearly not how the rule should play out and you are enforcing it unclearly.
16 June 2008, 16:19
sublime
16 June 2008, 16:20
dAn00b
16 June 2008, 16:21
jiriki | old people
Although Sublime, that would be a clever way to avoid rules. I will ask, lets say, Hivefish, to mercfade for us, then opponent wont allow it so I will just bug my connection with downloads or anything and because im warping too much so we need to take Hivefish to merc, ggs.
I don't care what you were promised. Besides you started playing, your previous private agreements don't count.
16 June 2008, 16:21
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
We had claimed a default, and i personally agreed with bb that we replay "when" and "if" i was feeling up for it and confident that it was our true strength.
There is also nothing to say that it wasn't just a normal pcw that was played.
Also i believe that we are "entitled" to post-pone the game since its in the "fair play" rule that we gave them a postponement for their semi's but we had to play our on the spot with out a few vital players. At this moment you have broken a rule enforced upon us many time. It is not a fair play rule that we we're forced or mentally made to played the game due to sarcastic comment made by you on the night. "It wouldn't be fun if the ensl was drag anymore etc.... "
Also, the warping problem with tom was NOT! let me repeat not sorted before the match , but half way in the match meaning we had no time to prepair or inform other members to stay on and play or replacement to our liking. You didn't tell us before the match and u expect to call a member from the blue to replace someone in mid game? very very poor admining. Preventing arguements is what you do, and you utterly failed.
I still believe that i did say to adz a week ago that we taken <-- please note the word taken, unless i say so overwise i still think we have? and to be honest i don't believe i've spoken to any admin about me refusing to take the default. do you ?
therefore the game was merely a pcw? if i was to be an arse , however you can consider it a official as it looked like one and probably was one, and in all fairness our vital players wasn't playing, and also on lucid we just felt that there was biased views which made us under perform as a team due to arguements.
16 June 2008, 16:21
sublime
16 June 2008, 16:22
sublime
You cannot apply laws without first taking into account mitigating circumstances. We set precedents on how we apply rules and this is one of these momentous occasions on which you can be forever emblazoned into NS history and set this law up correctly.
16 June 2008, 16:26
tjo
Either you let him play, or you don't. Not something inbetween.
Laughable.
16 June 2008, 16:26
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
Besides you started playing, your previous private agreements don't count.
does that mean if we played a game at any point of the week it would be considered the official?
and of course private agreements don't count, hmm doesn't that breach the "fair play rule" the one that admins have enforced so heavily ? doesn't that make the people that went back on the rule suspended ? make ur mind up.
16 June 2008, 16:26
jiriki | old people
16 June 2008, 16:27
sublime
16 June 2008, 16:28
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
16 June 2008, 16:29
jiriki | old people
So, what's there to lose? If the team doesn't want it, use another player. I thought I was being reasonable by allowing lump to play, but I guess I'm now being blamed for allowing him to paly when he could have just typed exit in console if he wasn't see its worthy.
16 June 2008, 16:29
sublime
I move to propose that a separate head admin takes hold of this case and that he or she be able to start the decision making process afresh.
That is of course, as long as ENSL wants to remove conflicts of interest and therefore uphold a strong fair play ruleset.
16 June 2008, 16:30
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
16 June 2008, 16:30
sublime
YOU DID NOT UPHOLD THE RULE CORRECTLY. ADMIT IT AND RIGHT YOUR MISTAKE.
16 June 2008, 16:31
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
16 June 2008, 16:32
jiriki | old people
So, what's there to lose? If the team doesn't want the ofer, use another player. I thought I was being reasonable by allowing lump to play, but I guess I'm now being blamed for allowing him to play when he could have just typed exit in console if he thought it was useless.
The fact that you start replaying a forfeit, does not give you any leverage over rules. When we let teams make their own rules or use any previous "karma", this goes to shitstorm, believe it or not.
16 June 2008, 16:32
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
Today starting this whole debate again and finally attacked me personally on private when I warned that I'm not interested in this whine anymore
ROFLs that like, someone calling george bush a slag and that person getting nuked for it!
wait the metaphor fits perfectly .. *think about it =P*
16 June 2008, 16:48
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
16 June 2008, 16:49
vallanhaamu | Anonym Anti Anti A.
16 June 2008, 17:00
Manikstor
Well tbh u guys were our biggest competition ever blah blah blah :/
now sub here is a little secret from peanut
The reason we didnt let Macpersil play was because he told ares he would suicide on mines. DO YOU REALLY WANT THAT?
16 June 2008, 17:02
sublime
16 June 2008, 17:03
Manikstor
16 June 2008, 17:03
vallanhaamu | Anonym Anti Anti A.
16 June 2008, 17:06
qin
16 June 2008, 17:08
vallanhaamu | Anonym Anti Anti A.
16 June 2008, 17:35
qin
16 June 2008, 17:36
Jamesbond007
LUMPPP GOTTT OWNEDDDD, UMMMMM UMMMMM AH AH
LUMPPP GOTTT OWNEDDDD, UMMMMM UMMMMM AH AH
LUMPPP GOTTT OWNEDDDD, UMMMMM UMMMMM AH AH
LUMPPP GOTTT OWNEDDDD, UMMMMM UMMMMM AH AH
LUMPPP GOTTT OWNEDDDD, UMMMMM UMMMMM AH AH
LUMPPP GOTTT OWNEDDDD, UMMMMM UMMMMM AH AH
LUMPPP GOTTT OWNEDDDD, UMMMMM UMMMMM AH AH
16 June 2008, 17:38
jiriki | old people
How many eLeagues have run? Do you know how fun it is after every fucking decision or ban, all you get is people whining at you and have the nerve to victimise themselves. Its like those guys who throw bottles at police men and call them "nazi polices", and think they can get away with it. Its so easy for you to say because you never have to take care of any shit.
Let me tell, previous head admin quit this job because he didnt want to take care of idiots like you.
16 June 2008, 17:41
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
good admins know when they're wrong , "sorry ain't the hardest word to say" =]
16 June 2008, 18:02
jiriki | old people
You don't probably even know the guy I'm talking about.
"ROFLs that like, someone calling george bush a slag and that person getting nuked for it!"
I would have not called you idiot before this comment.
"good admins know when they're wrong , "sorry ain't the hardest word to say" =]"
Sorry for enforcing rules (with little mercy). Sorry my ass.
16 June 2008, 18:21
Hammond | coolclan
16 June 2008, 18:22
tjerge
16 June 2008, 18:30
sublime
16 June 2008, 19:41
BerglunD | Snowrollers
ASK ADMIRABLE.
Me Doctor Admirable and BB where chatting after the game and we (me and doctor) did say all the time if they didnt play on that time, we took the forfeit, which Admirable said we could, we did, and where did that decision go? into Admirables fucking forehead lost forever? This is a complete mess, and tbh i dont care, i quit ns because of you shitheads. The point is ^rawR? WAS in the final, we took the forfeit, Admirable knew about it, WHY the fucking hell was a forfeited game replayed? we took a forfeit. Thats it, then they cant come later and try replaying it, we were in the final, end of story,
And YOU Jiriki, stop doing this to yourself, i can come over to finland and end your fucking gay life right away, You dont deserve to LIVE.
16 June 2008, 20:10
mu
STOP BANNING PEOPLE UNLESS THEY ARE CAUGHT CHEATING
EVERYTHING ELSE SHOULD BE A SUSPENSION
16 June 2008, 20:17
Tweadle
16 June 2008, 20:21
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 20:23
enigmatic | 9L
16 June 2008, 20:28
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 20:28
GibbZ | 9L
16 June 2008, 20:30
Tweadle
16 June 2008, 20:30
Fana | Archaea
YOU DID NOT UPHOLD THE RULE CORRECTLY. ADMIT IT AND RIGHT YOUR MISTAKE."
That's a load of crap. jiriki gave you a choice, if it was a problem YOU should've told him not to play, or he should've had the brains to not play. I totally agree on the ban, from the simple fact that lump needs to learn when it's time to shut the fuck up.
It's a shame about you not getting to play with your best roster, but you can blame Vital for that, not the admins. They've shown in the past (nL vs. sR) that they won't enforce sportsmanship, so you shouldn't expect them to.
16 June 2008, 20:30
Fana | Archaea
16 June 2008, 20:32
GibbZ | 9L
16 June 2008, 20:33
ShEePy
16 June 2008, 20:34
GreeN | cisequaltothree
16 June 2008, 20:34
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 20:35
ShEePy
16 June 2008, 20:37
Tweadle
Show me a league that enforces the intangible "sportsmanship" and i'll show you a retarded league with billions arguing over grey areas.
16 June 2008, 20:39
GibbZ | 9L
But seriously my take on this, vital were not being the best of teams to reason with in this matter. HOWEVER jiriki enforced a rule and whining about it is just pathetic... It was done for the best. With rules generally a teams going to lose out in any situation. Atleast in this situation the loss is to the rules and to the book. The ruling was fair.
16 June 2008, 20:39
Jamesbond007
SRRRYYYYY...
TAHT UR SO GHEY!!
HAHAHAHAHAOLOLOLOLOLOLOL U GOT BANNED MOTHER FUCKER
16 June 2008, 20:39
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 20:40
Fana | Archaea
Huh? I've said at least 10 times that we would play flatline at any time both of us had six. It's not our fault that they never do.
16 June 2008, 20:41
ShEePy
16 June 2008, 20:41
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 20:42
GibbZ | 9L
16 June 2008, 20:42
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 20:42
Fana | Archaea
16 June 2008, 20:43
Fana | Archaea
16 June 2008, 20:44
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 20:45
ShEePy
16 June 2008, 20:46
GibbZ | 9L
16 June 2008, 20:46
Jamesbond007
"BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA IM A STUPID NORWEG1AN/'@%&"
16 June 2008, 20:48
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 20:49
Tweadle
16 June 2008, 20:49
GibbZ | 9L
Please go play Hello kitty online, it's more suited to your level of intelligence and offences.
16 June 2008, 20:49
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 20:52
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 20:53
GibbZ | 9L
^
SO WHO THEN? You _fucking_ idiot. You address me over lump's ban? I never banned him? That was jiriki? Or are you _that_ retarded.
Glove's ban? Oh shit a temp. gather ban? Ohhh shiittteeee....
16 June 2008, 20:54
GreeN | cisequaltothree
16 June 2008, 20:55
ShEePy
16 June 2008, 20:55
GibbZ | 9L
"BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA IM A STUPID SWEDE/'@%&"
16 June 2008, 20:56
Jamesbond007
16 June 2008, 20:57
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 21:00
BerglunD | Snowrollers
16 June 2008, 21:02
GibbZ | 9L
16 June 2008, 21:04
Jamesbond007
16 June 2008, 21:04
enigmatic | 9L
16 June 2008, 21:09
Jamesbond007
16 June 2008, 21:16
Admirable | God Squad
I said that they could replay it if they saw fit, but that they were under no obligation to do so.
However, once you cross that replay line and the game is started you can't just throw your hands in the air and say that it doesn't count when things don't go your way.
At the end of the day RAWR were ill prepared with no subs, and I think Vital were the villains of the piece not poor old jiriki :(
I'm glad we can have these debates though, it's always fun.
16 June 2008, 21:30
sublime
16 June 2008, 21:33
enigmatic | 9L
16 June 2008, 21:36
GibbZ | 9L
16 June 2008, 21:38
sublime
GO AND DIE IN PUBLIC
16 June 2008, 21:46
GibbZ | 9L
16 June 2008, 21:55
RNDM | STAY ON GATES
a nun has hope in her soul, and the girl has soap in her hole.
16 June 2008, 21:59
Fana | Archaea
16 June 2008, 22:07
Starchy | Anonym Anti Anti A.
16 June 2008, 22:10
d-
16 June 2008, 22:15
sublime
16 June 2008, 22:32
Altbst
16 June 2008, 22:43
Fana | Archaea
16 June 2008, 22:58
sublime
16 June 2008, 23:07
atman
16 June 2008, 23:09
sublime
AND FUCK OFF WITH THE FAIL<INSERTWORDHERE> YOU MASSIVE ENORMOUS HUMUNGUS RAVING HOMOSEXUAL
16 June 2008, 23:09
Altbst
Sublime's Diary Page 219 Title: BEEN HIDEING IT FOR A WHILE, NOW IM GOING TO SCREAM IT OFF THE FORUM HILLTOPS.
16 June 2008, 23:35
Aleksi | FINNSTACK
"
LUK GUYZ 1M BERGY!!!!
"BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA IM A STUPID SWEDE/'@%&"
"
This really shows what a bunch of stupid faggots this community is, i mean sprogga, sorry. What did Mark ever do to claim the title of a Head Admin?
:--------------------D
17 June 2008, 04:59
GibbZ | 9L
17 June 2008, 05:33
Aleksi | FINNSTACK
17 June 2008, 05:43
Admirable | God Squad
17 June 2008, 08:27
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
17 June 2008, 09:23
Aleksi | FINNSTACK
17 June 2008, 09:38
BerglunD | Snowrollers
17 June 2008, 09:57
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
17 June 2008, 10:23
Arj | Ant
Banning people for wasting your time will always cost you more time then it will bring you, this is an obvious result.
Banning people permanently will result in people wasting your time even more with whine whenever they can.
This scenario with lump is rediculous. You can't force rules during a round, if you'd like to do that, stop the round. When you choose to force rules, force them, don't go half way. Let lump play, or disallow him to play. Not allowing him to go fade or lerk.. absurd.
Time for a new admin team if you ask me.
Fana, tjo, b1, any sensible guy, please create a new admin team. Make it a bigger team to devide time.
17 June 2008, 10:54
BerglunD | Snowrollers
I agree with that.
17 June 2008, 10:56
qin
17 June 2008, 11:30
GreeN | cisequaltothree
17 June 2008, 11:52
jiriki | old people
Yeah, great job Arj, you are again talking about a thing you have no clue about. I enforced the rule between rounds and gave him the option to not play at all (which rules demand) or play with the limitation. He chose to play with the limitation. If they hadn't spare players, its their problem.
I did not enforce it "suddenly during a round", which is total bullshit.
"Banning people for wasting your time will always cost you more time then it will bring you, this is an obvious result."
Well its not up to you. I think I don't even bother commenting to these lies and illogical statements you guys spread here next time to save my time.
"Let lump play, or disallow him to play. Not allowing him to go fade or lerk.. absurd."
Again. It was his choice, I made an exception when the rules would have demanded he was completely unable to play. I don't understand how making their team a favor (giving them a choice to play with the limitation) is somehow absurd.
17 June 2008, 11:57
Fana | Archaea
17 June 2008, 12:48
BerglunD | Snowrollers
17 June 2008, 14:18
Admirable | God Squad
So I think it's not unreasonable to he "had" to play due to Vital's refusal to allow Mercpersil.
However, it was the poor preparation of RAWR and the stubbornness of Vital that created this difficult situation, not the ENSL Admins.
17 June 2008, 14:32
ZiGGY
As I said alll the way back in post 3, very unprofessional lol; for those of you who werent there Toms warp was BAD, like Pete Rodriguez bad, and he shouldnt have played at all. We lost Lucid deservedly so, the play was poor, not even omg-im-so-great-berg-d-swinehund or pat-attack (gogo gay theme) would have saved it; That is totally besides the point lol, Jiriki youre acting like a 10 year old, dont lecture me on admin skills when youre communicating this poorly.
NOW all stfu and be friends (except 8DOM8 who can try and summon a friend out of his own emo tears)
17 June 2008, 15:13
GibbZ | 9L
Jiriki enforced a rule which was asked, and modified it so that Rawr^ wouldn't have to forfeit. It's all fair. He's sticking to the rules while at the same time modifying them so a team (Rawr) doesn't lose out completely. Yet you whine when an admin A) enforces rules B) adjusts the rule which benefits your team more then the original
- I am sorry to say Rawr^ all of jirikis decisions were in accordance to the rules. He never made one biased or unjust decision.
Sure the fact is maybe it was a little harsh that vital didn't want lump to play. But in truth I was watching and, fucking hell, lump did warp ALOT. I'm not saying it's an advantage or anything, but still, vital raised a point.
Jiriki fixed that point they raised, and instead of just being happy that lump could play, you whine. It's stupid.
In any other game I assure you that lump's ping would have broken several rules and I'm sure the course of action would have been to remove him. <- Even if that's the case ENSL has it's own rules. You cannot complain about RULES after they have been enforced... you can't just agree with them then disagree. It's only because you see it from your view that you think what you think. Just imagine if vital's fade was warping horribly. I KNOW Doctor, that you, would have had a massive whine at that and tried to get it removed.
Stop being massive arrogant pricks and get a grip on the situation.
And moving swiftly on to Arj.
How fucking dumb are you? No seriously, you have to be the most idiotic person to have ever set foot in this league. Your not twisted in the head your just a plain idiot. You genuinely think everytime something crops up you know the WHOLE situation when in reality you just know the minor details, and nothing at that. You have biased views which are based on your own opinion of facts that you know nothing about.
Seriously everytime you comment, what ever it's about, I think to myself, "what the fuck is that douchebag on about?".
Sorry for my language, I can't contain myself against a fuckhead of your calliber. I really can't.
17 June 2008, 15:31
sublime
17 June 2008, 15:49
vallanhaamu | Anonym Anti Anti A.
17 June 2008, 16:09
sublime
17 June 2008, 16:12
BerglunD | Snowrollers
17 June 2008, 17:10
NellyJai | HasBeens & NeverWas
I can't be arsed to deal with people like you, "its okay to use racist comments providing its a joke is it now zma?" from that alone you are bad. And thanks to how admins have handled this situation has made my last season a shit experience.
ps: adz is great =] he can actually actually control a riot without calling people, something u also fail , oh great admin.
final wishes to vital and ns-f in the final. And sorry tweadle i couldn't keep to my promise , i tried and tried but its not worth it.
17 June 2008, 17:48
jiriki | old people
17 June 2008, 18:03
BerglunD | Snowrollers
17 June 2008, 18:05
GibbZ | 9L
Your right, in one sense I am a bad admin, I should have stuck to what was right and banned you along with bergy earlier in the season for knowing that bergy was multiclanning. However, like jiriki, I tried to help your clan out by not doing that. Obviously everytime we try and help problems occur.
I never insulted you in the last post actually, so this reply is rather odd. Even so, in everything I have said Doctor it was to defend jiriki because the fact remains your whining over something and escalating it to such a degree. In that sense, I do think your stupid. Sorry if it insults you, it's just I can't see any logic behind your thinking. Whining when an admin enforces the rule and even adjusts it so it's not so detremental... It's just ludacris.
Sure I'm arrogant doctor. Why? Because in this case I know im completely 100% right, and you're wrong.
17 June 2008, 18:10
gobot | Stray Dogs
17 June 2008, 18:24
ZiGGY
Yeah next time, if ever, we handle with rawr, we won't follow rules, that's for sure. "
thats a threat right? lol
17 June 2008, 18:35
BerglunD | Snowrollers
the rest did like me, quit :P
17 June 2008, 18:47
naduli | Exertus
(you're killing ns one by one)
17 June 2008, 19:01
naduli | Exertus
17 June 2008, 19:03
GibbZ | 9L
17 June 2008, 19:05
BerglunD | Snowrollers
17 June 2008, 19:43
GreeN | cisequaltothree
17 June 2008, 20:12
Admirable | God Squad
Not because of any actual decisions that have been made, but purely because of the tone of some comments that have been made are highly inflammatory.
As admins we are always dealing with disputes and tempers will flare, but if we don't treat players with respect at all times how can we are selves expect to be respected.
Obviously everyone has their breaking point, and some people are not as thick skinned as the Irish, but as admins I think we have a duty to rise above it and bite our tongues.
17 June 2008, 23:41
jiriki | old people
18 June 2008, 01:31
qin
18 June 2008, 04:07
Aleksi | FINNSTACK
18 June 2008, 04:53
Arj | Ant
The incidents that occured are not the biggest problem. They were mostly bad decisions, but still, admins have the right and should try to uphold some kind of standard.
The thing that made it really bad, was the way they reacted to "the public" when offence was taken to "bad" decisions.
Communication should not be this way, in the main topics, hanging people on stage. Ban someone (suspensions only) and explain to him why. Nobody else has to know about it, news will go round. If someone whines in random comments, respond to them to go to the discussion forum.
18 June 2008, 05:54
ShEePy
18 June 2008, 09:16
BerglunD | Snowrollers
jirki, is it what I want? :O since when did i even get into that threaten stuff except for me saying that theres no rawr anymore
18 June 2008, 11:31
jiriki | old people
If you are talking about the warp thing, it was not really a decision, it was rule enforcement and people here like blaming judge for bad laws. What it goes to Mp/lump bans, is that you never had to be an admin arguing with these people on your free time unpaid, so you can only blame us but you never have to face the consequences of your opinions.
Basically Arj, I've banned people in silence in the past but I decided to post news for the simple reason that I want the bans to have cautionary effect. My goal is not whip lump etc. to the death but have it an effect on the behaviour of everyone in the future. Thats why the racism etc. bans are public, so people know we actually monitor the situation. The more people know the better, because then more people know the boundaries and that we are actually punishing people.
Admirable is an respectful admin but he has more charisma and local authority on people than I do, so its easier for him to push decisions. He has also less stuff on his plate which he can if necessary delegate to me. I'm not that sympathetic person when it comes to solving conflicts, so I may not collect all the respect points but I don't really care.
18 June 2008, 11:45
Arj | Ant
The statement you did not reply to (the reason I posted my comment):
"The thing that made it really bad, was the way they (admins) reacted to "the public" when offence was taken to "bad" decisions."
The statement states the actual problem. People make mistakes, admins make mistakes in communication, but not in every instance. If you choose to communicate openly, be sure the admins with "more charisma and local authority" bring the message.
If the public could ban an admin, some admins would have been banned multiple times, going by your own 'no tolerance' policy.
18 June 2008, 12:14
BerglunD | Snowrollers
18 June 2008, 12:21
vallanhaamu | Anonym Anti Anti A.
18 June 2008, 16:46
BerglunD | Snowrollers
18 June 2008, 19:57
frG | TROLLS
Would be better to lock this topic.
18 June 2008, 21:58
jiriki | old people
19 June 2008, 05:12
qin
19 June 2008, 05:48
BerglunD | Snowrollers
19 June 2008, 07:17
Android | Snowrollers
19 June 2008, 13:22
atman
and i think you were in pitchfork back then still so you're going down with us!
19 June 2008, 18:17
Arj | Ant
20 June 2008, 05:44
qin
20 June 2008, 06:24
beefcake
What happened, happened. I think the point has been proven preaty much about now - even for the most retarded person.
I can follow both views in these case, and I can only say I agree with the decision that the ENSL crew has taken. Eventhough it's sad that this was what happened to Rawr in this case.
But to crawl further down in this hole would be unnecessary and mostly disrespectful against the ENSL's Crews decision.
Only thing you can do after all of this whining is to prey that the ENSL crew would be so kind - to even consider - letting Lump play next season.
Respect the ENSL's crews decision - move on - and prey that they will give a thought about Lump, when next season appears.
This is my opinion about this case. And by this I think I can declare this topic for closed! (Finally)
20 June 2008, 19:27
BerglunD | Snowrollers
20 June 2008, 22:42
Admirable | God Squad
21 June 2008, 13:34
varro2
21 June 2008, 14:19
IsoK | Anonym Anti Anti A.
21 June 2008, 15:30
GibbZ | 9L
:rollseyes:
All the ban decisions so far this season and since I have been an admin, have always been accepted as a team and discussed amongst the staff.
Once again Arj, talking about something you know nothing about.
Please don't get offended by this, I am not trying to be harsh or anything... I think it's (admitting my flaws here) that I just have had enough of all the bullshit you say, always made on false evidence and a view which is always by proxy.
Hmmm...
22 June 2008, 01:40
Android | Snowrollers
*hope u dont have rules against admin bribes* :p
22 June 2008, 03:43
AltFrthz
22 June 2008, 12:41
Arj | Ant
23 June 2008, 05:37
Dr_G | ">
23 June 2008, 22:58
Johs
How fucking dumb are you? No seriously, you have to be the most idiotic person to have ever set foot in this league. Your not twisted in the head your just a plain idiot. You genuinely think everytime something crops up you know the WHOLE situation when in reality you just know the minor details, and nothing at that. You have biased views which are based on your own opinion of facts that you know nothing about."
Zamma, you have described exactly how every ensl player feel about Arj. Thank you.
7 July 2008, 00:30
Arj | Ant
7 July 2008, 07:20
New Comment
Please log in or register to post comments.